Comments on: perl 5.10 http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/ Just another clsung weblog Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:16:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Rene Ladan http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/comment-page-1/#comment-2466 Rene Ladan Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:16:28 +0000 http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/#comment-2466 I think the current plan is to replace 5.8.8 by 5.10.0 and patch all the perl ports in one big commit?

But what about making a 5.10.0 port next to the existing 5.8.8 port, and add 5.10.0 to the USE_PERL5 variable in Mk/bsd.perl.mk ? Maintainers can then migrate their ports to 5.10.0 themselves, without breaking existing functionality.

Today there is a lang/perl5.8 port and a lang/perl5 (5.6.2) port, so adding a third perl port wouldn’t hurt.

]]> By: clsung http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/comment-page-1/#comment-2452 clsung Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:20:06 +0000 http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/#comment-2452 Maybe it is worth to be a hero this time :p

I haven’t do this (5.10 in ports), so maybe just a tiny Makefile/distinfo updating :p

haha, but I don’t wanna see lots of ‘build error’ love letters from portmgr ;)

]]> By: delphij http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/comment-page-1/#comment-2446 delphij Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:51:03 +0000 http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/#comment-2446 Just wondering, will it break a lot of stuff? Perhaps it needs a portmgr build :)

]]> By: clsung http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/comment-page-1/#comment-2444 clsung Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:49:59 +0000 http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/#comment-2444 He’s on top of brave candidate list :)

]]> By: Steve http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/comment-page-1/#comment-2443 Steve Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:44:11 +0000 http://blogs.freebsdish.org/clsung/2008/04/11/17/#comment-2443 Ask Tobez.

]]>