Comments on: Progress in the linuxulator http://blogs.freebsdish.org/netchild/2007/01/09/progress-in-the-linuxulator/ Just another FreeBSD weblog Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:07:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: FreeBSD News, Article and Tutorial » Blog Archive » What’s cooking for FreeBSD 7? http://blogs.freebsdish.org/netchild/2007/01/09/progress-in-the-linuxulator/#comment-4381 FreeBSD News, Article and Tutorial » Blog Archive » What’s cooking for FreeBSD 7? Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:53:54 +0000 http://blogs.freebsdish.org/netchild/2007/01/09/progress-in-the-linuxulator/#comment-4381 [...] to -CURRENT Will appear in 7.0: sure Authors: Alexander Leidinger, Roman Divacky Homepage: blog post, cvs commit [...] [...] to -CURRENT Will appear in 7.0: sure Authors: Alexander Leidinger, Roman Divacky Homepage: blog post, cvs commit [...]

]]> By: qinying http://blogs.freebsdish.org/netchild/2007/01/09/progress-in-the-linuxulator/#comment-3737 qinying Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:06:42 +0000 http://blogs.freebsdish.org/netchild/2007/01/09/progress-in-the-linuxulator/#comment-3737 I have do some test on you linuxator,and I lookup you code .it seems that there is still something wrong with the linux signal emul . I have two question about the signal. 1\ when we want to kill a signal to a linux process(linux_kill),signal like SIGKILL or SIGSTOP should be linux process wide. that is mean we should depend on the "em "struct in a proc to find all the linux thread in the proc ,and kill them. but in your linuxtor,I find nothing to do with it. 2\ in nptl implemetation, pthread_cancel will send SIGCANCEL(number is 32) to a thread. but there is nothing to do with it .so pthread_cancel is still not done with it. I wish I can get answer I have do some test on you linuxator,and I lookup you code .it seems that there is still something wrong with the linux signal emul .
I have two question about the signal.
1 when we want to kill a signal to a linux process(linux_kill),signal like SIGKILL or SIGSTOP should be linux process wide. that is mean we should depend on the “em “struct in a proc to find all the linux thread in the proc ,and kill them. but in your linuxtor,I find nothing to do with it.
2 in nptl implemetation, pthread_cancel will send SIGCANCEL to a thread. but there is nothing to do with it .so pthread_cancel is still not done with it.

I wish I can get answer

]]>