<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: isc.FreeBSD.org Cluster Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.freebsdish.org/simon/2009/02/22/iscfreebsdorg-cluster-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.freebsdish.org/simon/2009/02/22/iscfreebsdorg-cluster-update/</link>
	<description>The rants, and more, of Simon L. Nielsen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.freebsdish.org/simon/2009/02/22/iscfreebsdorg-cluster-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.freebsdish.org/simon/?p=25#comment-2716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoops, I forgot to reply to this :-).

The systems behind firewalls are mainly used by the FreeBSD ports building systems and other parts which doesn&#039;t require huge ammounts of traffic.  Without really tuning the firewalls etc I can get more than 100Mbit/s so it&#039;s still pretty decent Internet connectivity :-).  While it would be a problem for the FTP mirror etc. for stuff like www.FreeBSD.org it wouldn&#039;t be a problem.  Last time I checked www.FreeBSD.org didn&#039;t use much more than ~5Mbit/s in avg.

Simon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, I forgot to reply to this :-).</p>
<p>The systems behind firewalls are mainly used by the FreeBSD ports building systems and other parts which doesn&#8217;t require huge ammounts of traffic.  Without really tuning the firewalls etc I can get more than 100Mbit/s so it&#8217;s still pretty decent Internet connectivity :-).  While it would be a problem for the FTP mirror etc. for stuff like <a href="http://www.FreeBSD.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.FreeBSD.org</a> it wouldn&#8217;t be a problem.  Last time I checked <a href="http://www.FreeBSD.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.FreeBSD.org</a> didn&#8217;t use much more than ~5Mbit/s in avg.</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isc.FreeBSD.org klasterio atnaujinimas &#124; FreeBSD.lt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.freebsdish.org/simon/2009/02/22/iscfreebsdorg-cluster-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2634</link>
		<dc:creator>isc.FreeBSD.org klasterio atnaujinimas &#124; FreeBSD.lt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.freebsdish.org/simon/?p=25#comment-2634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pla?iau [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pla?iau [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivoras</title>
		<link>http://blogs.freebsdish.org/simon/2009/02/22/iscfreebsdorg-cluster-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>ivoras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.freebsdish.org/simon/?p=25#comment-2633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s behind these firewalls? The use of low-power CPU and NIC suggest these are not the main, publicly-accessible servers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s behind these firewalls? The use of low-power CPU and NIC suggest these are not the main, publicly-accessible servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
